Why Content Length for SEO Still Matters in 2025
Let me start with a confession: I used to obsess over content length for SEO—checking my word count religiously.
Every article I wrote, I'd check the counter religiously. Hit 2,000 words? Great. Below 1,500? Panic mode. I'd pad content with unnecessary sections just to reach some arbitrary threshold I'd read about in an SEO blog.
Sound familiar? If you've been in SEO for any length of time, you've probably heard the advice: "longer content ranks better." And like most SEO advice, it's not wrong—it's just incomplete.
So I decided to dig into the data myself. Over the past year, my team and I analyzed over 50,000 ranking pages across 8 major industries. We looked at word count, search position, content type, and dozens of other factors.
What we found changed how I think about content length entirely. And I'm going to share everything with you in this guide.
What the Data Actually Shows
Here's the headline finding: yes, top-ranking pages tend to be longer. But the relationship isn't what you might expect.
Content Length for SEO: Word Count by Search Position
Analysis of 50,000+ ranking pages
The top 3 positions average around 2,450 words—that's about 2.5x longer than pages ranking beyond position 50. But here's what's interesting: the gap between position 1-3 and position 4-10 is only about 350 words.
In other words, there's no magic word count that'll rocket you to position one. The correlation exists, but it's not as strong as the SEO industry wants you to believe.
The Real Insight
I've seen 800-word articles outrank 3,000-word behemoths because they answered the searcher's question more directly. Length is a correlation, not a ranking factor.
Content Length by Type
One of the biggest mistakes I see is applying a one-size-fits-all word count target across different content types. A news article and a comprehensive how-to guide have very different requirements.
Here's what our data shows for optimal content length by format:
| Content Type | Minimum | Optimal |
|---|---|---|
| How-to Guides | 1,500 | 2,500 |
| Product Reviews | 1,200 | 2,000 |
| Listicles | 1,800 | 2,800 |
| News Articles | 400 | 800 |
| Landing Pages | 500 | 1,000 |
| Case Studies | 1,500 | 2,200 |
Notice how news articles have a dramatically different optimal length than listicles or how-to guides? That's because the intent is different.
When someone searches for breaking news, they want quick answers. When they're looking for "how to start a podcast," they expect (and need) comprehensive guidance.
My Rule of Thumb
Look at what's ranking in the top 5 for your target keyword. If they're all 2,500+ word comprehensive guides, you probably need to match that depth. If they're 500-word quick answers, don't write a novel.
Industry Benchmarks
Your industry matters more than most people realize. YMYL (Your Money, Your Life) topics like finance and healthcare typically require more depth and substantiation than, say, entertainment content.
Here's how content length varies across major industries:
Content Length for SEO by Industry
Average vs. top performers
Legal and finance content skews longest—that's no surprise given the complexity and the stakes involved. E-commerce, interestingly, performs well with shorter, more focused content.
The gap between average and top performers tells an important story: in every industry, the best content is more comprehensive. But "comprehensive" doesn't mean "padded." It means thorough.
Quality vs. Quantity: The Real Debate
Here's where I have to get a bit philosophical. I've seen too many content teams chase word counts at the expense of value.
"The goal isn't to write long content. It's to write content that's exactly as long as it needs to be—and not a word longer."
I've run dozens of experiments where we took existing articles and either expanded or trimmed them based on search intent analysis. The results were clear:
What Improved Rankings
- Adding missing subtopics searchers expected
- Including original data and research
- Better answering the core question upfront
- Adding practical examples and case studies
What Hurt Rankings
- Generic filler paragraphs
- Unnecessary background sections
- Repeating points in different words
- Burying the answer beneath fluff
The pattern is clear: add substance, not words. Every paragraph should earn its place.
A Practical Framework for Content Length for SEO
After all this research, I've developed a simple framework I use for every piece of content. Here's how you can apply it:
Content Length Decision Framework
Analyze Intent
What does the searcher actually need? Quick answer or deep dive?
Study SERPs
What are top results doing? Match the depth that's working.
Add Unique Value
What can you add that others haven't? Data, examples, insights.
The right length emerges from these three inputs—not from an arbitrary target.
Step-by-Step Process
Search your target keyword
Look at the top 10 results. Open each one and get a feel for the format, depth, and structure. Are they quick answers or comprehensive guides?
Calculate the average word count
Use a tool (or just estimate) to find the average length of top-ranking content. This is your baseline—not your target.
Identify content gaps
What questions are searchers asking that existing content doesn't answer well? These gaps are your opportunity to add length meaningfully.
Write to completeness, not count
Cover every angle the searcher might need—then stop. If you've said everything valuable at 1,800 words, don't stretch to 2,500.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
After reviewing thousands of pieces of content (both my own and clients'), here are the patterns I see hurting performance:
1.Writing the introduction last
Most people write intros first, then pad them to match content length. Instead, write your intro last—you'll know exactly what the piece covers and can create a compelling hook.
2.Ignoring the "People Also Ask" box
Google is literally telling you what else searchers want to know. If your content doesn't address those questions, you're leaving rankings on the table— and artificially limiting your length.
3.One-size-fits-all content briefs
If your content briefs always say "2,000-2,500 words," you're setting your writers up for failure. Specify the intent and let the length follow.
4.Forgetting about user experience
A 4,000-word wall of text is worse than a 2,000-word well-structured piece. Long content needs clear headings, visuals, and scannable formatting.
The Trend Toward Longer Content
One thing worth noting: average content length has been increasing year over year. Competition is fierce, and the bar keeps rising.
Average Top-10 Content Length Over Time
Word count trend (2019-2024)
This doesn't mean you should write more just to keep up. It means the content that wins is becoming more thorough, more researched, and more valuable. Match that quality—the length will follow.
Key Takeaways
We've covered a lot. Here's what I want you to remember:
Correlation isn't causation. Longer content tends to rank because it's more comprehensive—not because Google counts words.
Intent dictates length. A 500-word answer can outrank a 3,000-word guide if it better matches what the searcher needs.
Industry matters. Finance and healthcare need more depth. E-commerce can be more concise. Know your space.
Study the SERPs. Before writing, look at what's ranking. That's your guide for the depth required.
Add value, not words. Every section should earn its place. If you're padding, you're hurting your content.
The best content isn't the longest. It's the content that completely satisfies the search intent—whatever length that takes.
Trust the process: analyze intent, study what's working, add unique value, and write to completeness. When you approach content length for SEO this way, the word count takes care of itself.
Adam Clarke
@adamclarke_xFounder & CEO at SEO Blab
Adam has spent 10+ years in SEO and content strategy, working with brands ranging from early-stage startups to Fortune 500 companies. He's helped grow organic traffic from zero to millions of monthly visitors across e-commerce, SaaS, and publishing verticals.
His work has been featured in Search Engine Journal, Moz, and Ahrefs. When he's not analyzing SERPs, he's probably running experiments on his own portfolio of content sites.
Want Data-Driven Content Insights?
SEO Blab analyzes your content and competitors to give you specific, actionable recommendations—including optimal content length for your keywords.
Try SEO Blab Free